<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><default:channel xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" rdf:about="http://ovaltest2007.blog.co.uk/"><title>Weak decision by Rahul Dravid</title><link>http://ovaltest2007.blog.co.uk/</link><description></description><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en-EU</dc:language><admin:generatorAgent xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" rdf:resource="http://www.blog.co.uk"/><sy:updatePeriod xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">8</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ovaltest2007.blog.co.uk/2007/08/24/weak_decision_by_rahul_dravid~2864210/"/></rdf:Seq></items></default:channel><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://ovaltest2007.blog.co.uk/2007/08/24/weak_decision_by_rahul_dravid~2864210/"><default:title>Weak decision by Rahul Dravid</default:title><default:link>http://ovaltest2007.blog.co.uk/2007/08/24/weak_decision_by_rahul_dravid~2864210/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-08-24T18:23:35+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;The decision of not putting England to follow on for the last Test of the India-England series at oval puzzled experts and fans alike ; Indian fans were puzzled and frustrated while English fans were puzzled and overjoyed......but everyone was puzzled nevertheless !!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;This ridiculous decision taken by Indian captain Rahul Dravid just denied India their well deserved 2-0 victory over England. When England finished their 1st. innings they were trailing behind India by 319 runs. How many times do you get a situation like this in Test cricket? And if you do not impose the follow on even in that situation then when actually do you do that?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;People in big cities and small towns in India were asking these questions as were experts like Micheal Holding and Ravi Shastri in the commentary box.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;England obviously grabbed this unexpected good luck with both hands and made a fantastic use of the extra swing available that morning. The very very slow (12 runs in 96 balls) batting by Dravid in the second innings was equally inexplicable.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;After the match, when Indians were celebrating the 1-0 series victory, I was thinking of the famous Indian victory at Lords in Natwest final.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Well, it seems we have left those days of guts and courage far, far behind ! &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://ovaltest2007.blog.co.uk/2007/08/24/weak_decision_by_rahul_dravid~2864210/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>The decision of not putting England to follow on for the last Test of the India-England series at oval puzzled experts and fans alike ; Indian fans were puzzled and frustrated while English fans were puzzled and overjoyed......but everyone was puzzled nevertheless !!</p>
	<p>This ridiculous decision taken by Indian captain Rahul Dravid just denied India their well deserved 2-0 victory over England. When England finished their 1st. innings they were trailing behind India by 319 runs. How many times do you get a situation like this in Test cricket? And if you do not impose the follow on even in that situation then when actually do you do that?</p>
	<p>People in big cities and small towns in India were asking these questions as were experts like Micheal Holding and Ravi Shastri in the commentary box.</p>
	<p>England obviously grabbed this unexpected good luck with both hands and made a fantastic use of the extra swing available that morning. The very very slow (12 runs in 96 balls) batting by Dravid in the second innings was equally inexplicable.</p>
	<p>After the match, when Indians were celebrating the 1-0 series victory, I was thinking of the famous Indian victory at Lords in Natwest final.</p>
	<p>Well, it seems we have left those days of guts and courage far, far behind ! </p>
	<p>
<br>

</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://ovaltest2007.blog.co.uk/2007/08/24/weak_decision_by_rahul_dravid~2864210/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item></rdf:RDF>
